Been wanting to post about this all week, but haven’t had time. In the newest issue, "America’s Favorite News Magazine" - TIME gives a free finger fuck to the far-right with its cover profile of Ann Coulter. The article inside is lazy hagiographic horseshit that treats Ann like a conservative Bill Hicks ("a right wing Ali-G" is the actual quote) , and her detractors as humorless PC stiffs who miss the subtlety of her barbs. "Like, lighten up guys, she’s just joshing!" (This is the old Limbaugh defense, like when he told a black caller to take the bone out of their nose). Here are some of her funniest ‘bits’:
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." - Sept. 12, 2001
"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
"When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker Lindh is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too. Otherwise, they will turn out to be outright traitors."
"(Sheryl) Crow explained that the best way to solve problems is to not have enemies.’ War solves that problem too: We won’t have any enemies because we’re going to kill them."
"I think we had enough laws about the turn-of-the-century. We don’t need any more." Asked how far back would she go to repeal laws, she replied, "Well, before the New Deal … [The Emancipation Proclamation] would be a good start."
Ann Coulter: I take the biblical idea. God gave us the earth.
Democratic Strategist Peter Fenn: Oh, OK.
Coulter: We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees.
Fenn: This is a great idea.
Coulter: God says, "Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It’s yours."
I really cannot imagine where we are headed when a vile proto-fascist like Coulter is given the stamp of approval of the consensus crowd. Check out this line from near the end of the article: "On TV or in person, you can trust that Coulter will speak from her heart. The officialdom of punditry, so full of phonies and dullards, would suffer without her humor and fire." Now, check his pathetic defense in an interview with Columbia Journalism Review about the cover story. The rationalizations are laughably inconsistent, ranging from justifying it b/c they had Michael Moore on the cover to excusing it b/c they had Hitler and Stalin on there as well. The first obviously concocts a false rhetorical equivalence, and in the second he is saying cover treatment doesn’t mean approval. Now, I haven’t read either of the two dictator issues, but I’ll lay good money down that Hitler or Stalin didn’t get the gushing valentine Coulter lucks into here. The article states "Coulter has a reputation for carelessness with facts, and if you Google the words Ann Coulter lies, you will drown in results. But I didn’t find many outright Coulter errors." But yet, when confronted with the fact that he may have missed, oh, a few in the interview with CJR - "My story was not primarily about picking apart … all 1,000 of Ann Coulter’s columns or the hundreds and hundreds of pages that she’s written in her books. My job in this story was not to be a fact-checker"
(Sound of needle being violently jerked from record)
Then why the fuck did you choose journalism as a career?????? This isn’t the Weekly Reader, this is the god-damn cover story for TIME magazine on a highly controversial political ‘thinker’, one who is frequently, and rightly, accused of making most of what she says up. Maybe fact-checking shoulda landed somewhere near the top of the old priority list, you think?
Anyway, the point is, words have consequences, and all this wildly irresponsible rhetoric will enact a heavy price somewhere. Given the extremely polarized, and more importantly, dangerous (esp. if you’re gay or Muslim) political climate right now, the worst possible thing you can do is give legitimacy to nutjobs like Ann Coulter, Michael Savage, Michelle Malkin or whatever reprehensible mouthpiece is most popular next week. But the media continues, letting the hard right pull their strings, e.g. doing their best to shove the extremist viewpoint on Schiavo down an unwilling public’s throat, and looking the other way when Republicans issued coded fatwas on the judiciary when it didn’t rule their way. A president narrowly squeaks by for a second term, and the media is ready to hand over the keys to the republic to the mouth breathers and the faith healers. The term "mainstream media" is quickly becoming an oxymoron. The far right is firmly in the driver’s seat, and the rest of us are just along for the ride.